DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Opel Campo vs 1996 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Campo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSuzuki
CampoModelVitara
1995Model year1996
Pick-upBody typeCabriolet
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

23,1 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
135 km/hTop speed137 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
94 HPPower75 HP
170 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/80 R15

Dimensions

4980 mmLength3630 mm
1690 mmWidth1670 mm
1710 mmHeight1630 mm
—Weight1220 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Opel Campo and 1996 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…