DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Suzuki Vitara vs 1995 Opel Campo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Campo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeOpel
VitaraModelCampo
1996Model year1995
CabrioletBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h23,1 s
137 km/hTop speed135 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
75 HPPower94 HP
135 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

3630 mmLength4980 mm
1670 mmWidth1690 mm
1630 mmHeight1710 mm
1220 KgWeight—
2200 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Suzuki Vitara and 1995 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…