DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1981 Opel Ascona vs 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOldsmobile
AsconaModelCutlass
1981Model year1981
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2410 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
144 HPPower106 HP
210 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
195/60 R14Tyre size185/75 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4321 mmLength4835 mm
1670 mmWidth1765 mm
1380 mmHeight1375 mm
1030 KgWeight1275 Kg
2518 mmWheelbase2665 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1981 Opel Ascona and 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…