E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 80 vs 1981 Opel Ascona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Ascona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Ascona
AudiMakeOpel
80ModelAscona
1982Model year1981
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Ascona
9,1 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement2410 cc
136 HPPower144 HP
176 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Ascona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Ascona
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R14

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Ascona
4383 mmLength4321 mm
1682 mmWidth1670 mm
1365 mmHeight1380 mm
1190 KgWeight1030 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2518 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 80 and 1981 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Ascona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1982 Audi 100VS1982 Audi 80Audi 100 vs Audi 801982 and 1982 model years1982 Opel MantaVS1982 Audi 80Opel Manta vs Audi 801982 and 1982 model years1983 Audi 200VS1982 Audi 80Audi 200 vs Audi 801983 and 1982 model years1982 Saab 900VS1982 Audi 80Saab 900 vs Audi 801982 and 1982 model years1982 Ford MustangVS1982 Audi 80Ford Mustang vs Audi 801982 and 1982 model years

Comments are loading…