1981 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 2.3i (106 Hp) 1981Overall Score62.25/100
1981 Ford Mustang vs 1981 Opel Ascona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1981 • Opel
Ascona
Opel Ascona 2.4 (144 Hp) 1981Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationOpel Ascona
FordMakeOpel
MustangModelAscona
1981Model year1981
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationOpel Ascona
—0–100 km/h7,6 s
165 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2301 ccEngine displacement2410 cc
106 HPPower144 HP
183 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationOpel Ascona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank50 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationOpel Ascona
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R14Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationOpel Ascona
4560 mmLength4321 mm
1735 mmWidth1670 mm
1320 mmHeight1380 mm
1340 KgWeight1030 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2518 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1981 Ford Mustang and 1981 Opel Ascona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…