DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Antara vs 2016 BMW 4 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeBMW
AntaraModel4 Serisi
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
200 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
184 HPPower184 HP
400 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4596 mmLength4638 mm
1850 mmWidth1825 mm
1761 mmHeight1384 mm
—Weight1700 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Antara and 2016 BMW 4 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…