DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2016 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeOpel
4 SerisiModelAntara
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
230 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
184 HPPower184 HP
270 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4638 mmLength4596 mm
1825 mmWidth1850 mm
1384 mmHeight1761 mm
1700 KgWeight—
2810 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW 4 Serisi and 2016 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…