2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
2016 Ford Ranger vs 2016 Opel Antara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Opel
Antara
Opel Antara 2.2 CDTI (184 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationOpel Antara
FordMakeOpel
RangerModelAntara
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationOpel Antara
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
160 HPPower184 HP
385 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationOpel Antara
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationOpel Antara
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationOpel Antara
5362 mmLength4596 mm
1860 mmWidth1850 mm
1815 mmHeight1761 mm
1883 KgWeight—
3220 mmWheelbase2707 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Ranger and 2016 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…