DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Antara vs 2016 Fiat Toro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFiat
AntaraModelToro
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement2360 cc
184 HPPower186 HP
400 NmTorque244 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears9
—Tyre size215/65 R16; 225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4596 mmLength4915 mm
1850 mmWidth1844 mm
1761 mmHeight1737 mm
—Weight1704 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Antara and 2016 Fiat Toro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…