DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight vs 1995 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeJaguar
Eighty-EightModelXJ
1996Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
200 km/hTop speed232 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3980 cc
243 HPPower241 HP
380 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank86 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5090 mmLength5023 mm
1880 mmWidth1798 mm
1410 mmHeight1314 mm
1590 KgWeight1800 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight and 1995 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…