DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Oldsmobile Aurora vs 1996 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeOldsmobile
AuroraModelEighty-Eight
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
217 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3995 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
253 HPPower243 HP
352 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/60 R16 STyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5218 mmLength5090 mm
1891 mmWidth1880 mm
1407 mmHeight1410 mm
1795 KgWeight1590 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Oldsmobile Aurora and 1996 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…