DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Jaguar XJS vs 1996 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeOldsmobile
XJSModelEighty-Eight
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h—
237 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3980 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
233 HPPower243 HP
366 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
89 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/55 ZR16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4820 mmLength5090 mm
1793 mmWidth1880 mm
1254 mmHeight1410 mm
1705 KgWeight1590 Kg
2588 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Jaguar XJS and 1996 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…