DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1990 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeFord
CutlassModelThunderbird
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3350 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
213 HPPower234 HP
291 NmTorque447 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank72 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/70 R15 STyre size225/60 R16V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4921 mmLength5088 mm
1804 mmWidth1847 mm
1391 mmHeight1333 mm
1585 KgWeight1704 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1990 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…