DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Dodge Monaco vs 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeOldsmobile
MonacoModelCutlass
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

195 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2975 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
152 HPPower213 HP
232 NmTorque291 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank63 lt
15 ltUrban consumption16 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/70 R14Tyre size205/70 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4900 mmLength4921 mm
1780 mmWidth1804 mm
1390 mmHeight1391 mm
1355 KgWeight1585 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Dodge Monaco and 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…