DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Ford Thunderbird vs 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeOldsmobile
ThunderbirdModelCutlass
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
234 HPPower213 HP
447 NmTorque291 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/60 R16VTyre size205/70 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength4921 mm
1847 mmWidth1804 mm
1333 mmHeight1391 mm
1704 KgWeight1585 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Ford Thunderbird and 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…