2010 • Nissan
Rogue
Nissan Rogue 2.5i (170 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
2010 Nissan Rogue vs 2010 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Rogue
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Ranger
NissanMakeFord
RogueModelRanger
2010Model year2010
SUV, CrossoverBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Ranger
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
170 HPPower143 HP
237 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Ranger
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
CVTGears5
215/70 R16; 225/60 R17; 225/55 R18Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Ranger
4646 mmLength5075 mm
1801 mmWidth1805 mm
1659 mmHeight1745 mm
1560 KgWeight—
2690 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Nissan Rogue and 2010 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Rogue leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…