2010 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
2010 Ford Ranger vs 2010 Nissan Rogue Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Nissan
Rogue
Nissan Rogue 2.5i (170 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Rogue
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Rogue
FordMakeNissan
RangerModelRogue
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Rogue
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
143 HPPower170 HP
330 NmTorque237 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Rogue
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5GearsCVT
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size215/70 R16; 225/60 R17; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Rogue
5075 mmLength4646 mm
1805 mmWidth1801 mm
1745 mmHeight1659 mm
—Weight1560 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Ranger and 2010 Nissan Rogue approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Rogue leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…