DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo XC70 vs 2010 Nissan Rogue Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Rogue

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
XC70ModelRogue
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
175 HPPower170 HP
420 NmTorque237 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—GearsCVT
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 225/60 R17; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4646 mm
1861 mmWidth1801 mm
1604 mmHeight1659 mm
1742 KgWeight1560 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo XC70 and 2010 Nissan Rogue approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Rogue leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…