DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Murano vs 2015 Honda Pilot Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHonda
MuranoModelPilot
2010Model year2015
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3471 cc
256 HPPower257 HP
334 NmTorque347 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank79 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
235/65 R18Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4870 mm
1885 mmWidth1995 mm
1720 mmHeight1845 mm
1790 KgWeight2062 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Murano and 2015 Honda Pilot approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…