DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Buick LaCrosse vs 2010 Nissan Murano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick LaCrosse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeNissan
LaCrosseModelMurano
2007Model year2010
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
220 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
240 HPPower256 HP
311 NmTorque334 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank82 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
225/55 R17Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5030 mmLength4860 mm
1855 mmWidth1885 mm
1460 mmHeight1720 mm
1620 KgWeight1790 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Buick LaCrosse and 2010 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick LaCrosse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…