DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Porsche Boxster vs 2010 Nissan Murano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Porsche Boxster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PorscheMakeNissan
BoxsterModelMurano
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
260 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3179 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
280 HPPower256 HP
0 NmTorque334 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank82 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
11 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/55 R17; 235/50 R17Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4329 mmLength4860 mm
1801 mmWidth1885 mm
1295 mmHeight1720 mm
1385 KgWeight1790 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Porsche Boxster and 2010 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Porsche Boxster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…