DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Nissan Micra vs 2009 Renault Logan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeRenault
MicraModelLogan
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower102 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/50R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3719 mmLength4250 mm
1660 mmWidth1735 mm
1540 mmHeight1525 mm
1024 KgWeight—
2430 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Nissan Micra and 2009 Renault Logan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…