DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Audi A3 vs 2009 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationNissan Micra
AudiMakeNissan
A3ModelMicra
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationNissan Micra
11,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
186 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
102 HPPower110 HP
148 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationNissan Micra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationNissan Micra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size185/50R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationNissan Micra
4238 mmLength3719 mm
1765 mmWidth1660 mm
1421 mmHeight1540 mm
1185 KgWeight1024 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Audi A3 and 2009 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…