DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Logan vs 2009 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeNissan
LoganModelMicra
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
102 HPPower110 HP
145 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/50R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4250 mmLength3719 mm
1735 mmWidth1660 mm
1525 mmHeight1540 mm
—Weight1024 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Logan and 2009 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…