2009 • Nissan
Micra
Nissan Micra 2009Overall Score60.25/100
2009 Nissan Micra vs 2009 Audi A3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.6 (102 Hp) 2009Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Micra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan MicraSpecificationAudi A3
NissanMakeAudi
MicraModelA3
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3
Performance
Nissan MicraSpecificationAudi A3
9,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
183 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
110 HPPower102 HP
153 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan MicraSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan MicraSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/50R16Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan MicraSpecificationAudi A3
3719 mmLength4238 mm
1660 mmWidth1765 mm
1540 mmHeight1421 mm
1024 KgWeight1185 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Nissan Micra and 2009 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…