2017 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke Skypack 2017 1.5 DCi 110 HPOverall Score67.25/100
2017 Nissan Juke vs 2017 Honda WR-V Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Honda
WR-V
Honda WR-V 1.5 i-DTEC (100 Hp) 2017Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Honda WR-V
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan JukeSpecificationHonda WR-V
NissanMakeHonda
JukeModelWR-V
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan JukeSpecificationHonda WR-V
11,2 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
110 HPPower100 HP
260 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan JukeSpecificationHonda WR-V
DieselFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank40 lt
4,6 ltUrban consumption—
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan JukeSpecificationHonda WR-V
4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size195/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan JukeSpecificationHonda WR-V
4135 mmLength3999 mm
1767 mmWidth1734 mm
1565 mmHeight1601 mm
1305 kgWeight1176-1204 Kg
354 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2555 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Nissan Juke and 2017 Honda WR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…