DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda WR-V vs 2017 Nissan Juke Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda WR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeNissan
WR-VModelJuke
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
100 HPPower110 HP
200 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption4,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
195/60 R16Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3999 mmLength4135 mm
1734 mmWidth1767 mm
1601 mmHeight1565 mm
1176-1204 KgWeight1305 kg
—Luggage capacity354 lt
2555 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Honda WR-V

No additional feature records are available.

Nissan JukeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsSunroofUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda WR-V and 2017 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…