DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford Figo vs 2017 Nissan Juke Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
FigoModelJuke
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
100 HPPower110 HP
215 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption4,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
5Gears6
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4135 mm
1695 mmWidth1767 mm
1525 mmHeight1565 mm
—Weight1305 kg
—Luggage capacity354 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

Nissan JukeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsSunroofUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford Figo and 2017 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…