DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Nissan Juke vs 2017 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
JukeModelFigo
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
110 HPPower100 HP
260 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank40 lt
4,6 ltUrban consumption—
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4135 mmLength3995 mm
1767 mmWidth1695 mm
1565 mmHeight1525 mm
1305 kgWeight—
354 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2491 mm

Additional Features

Nissan JukeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsSunroofUSB PortBluetooth
Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Nissan Juke and 2017 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…