DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan Cedric vs 2002 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJeep
CedricModelCherokee
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
160 HPPower143 HP
248 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4430 mm
1690 mmWidth1820 mm
1425 mmHeight1865 mm
1520 KgWeight1790 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan Cedric and 2002 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…