DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chrysler Voyager vs 2002 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeNissan
VoyagerModelCedric
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
185 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
143 HPPower160 HP
320 NmTorque248 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank72 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4690 mm
1995 mmWidth1690 mm
1750 mmHeight1425 mm
1850 KgWeight1520 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chrysler Voyager and 2002 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…