DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2002 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeNissan
Grand CherokeeModelCedric
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
173 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3125 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
140 HPPower160 HP
384 NmTorque248 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,5 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4690 mm
1839 mmWidth1690 mm
1762 mmHeight1425 mm
1856 KgWeight1520 Kg
2691 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2002 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…