DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan Cedric vs 2002 Chrysler Voyager Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeChrysler
CedricModelVoyager
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
190 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
160 HPPower143 HP
248 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4805 mm
1690 mmWidth1995 mm
1425 mmHeight1750 mm
1520 KgWeight1850 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan Cedric and 2002 Chrysler Voyager approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…