1994 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.8d (100 Hp) 1994Overall Score49.25/100
1994 Nissan Cedric vs 1995 Opel Frontera Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Opel
Frontera
Opel Frontera 2.8 TD (113 Hp) 1995Overall Score48.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
49.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationOpel Frontera
NissanMakeOpel
CedricModelFrontera
1994Model year1995
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationOpel Frontera
17,6 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
163 km/hTop speed149 km/h
2825 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
100 HPPower113 HP
178 NmTorque242 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationOpel Frontera
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption16 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationOpel Frontera
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationOpel Frontera
4780 mmLength4192 mm
1745 mmWidth1780 mm
1410 mmHeight1721 mm
1590 KgWeight1828 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Nissan Cedric and 1995 Opel Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…