DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Ford Maverick vs 1994 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
MaverickModelCedric
1994Model year1994
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

19,0 s0–100 km/h17,6 s
145 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2663 ccEngine displacement2825 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
221 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/80 R15 RTyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4105 mmLength4780 mm
1735 mmWidth1745 mm
1805 mmHeight1410 mm
1730 KgWeight1590 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Ford Maverick and 1994 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…