DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Opel Frontera vs 1994 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
FronteraModelCedric
1995Model year1994
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

16,8 s0–100 km/h17,6 s
149 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2825 cc
113 HPPower100 HP
242 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
16 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
11 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4192 mmLength4780 mm
1780 mmWidth1745 mm
1721 mmHeight1410 mm
1828 KgWeight1590 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Opel Frontera and 1994 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…