1994 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.8d (100 Hp) 1994Overall Score49.25/100
1994 Nissan Cedric vs 1994 Ford Maverick Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Ford
Maverick
Ford Maverick 2.7 TD (3 dr) 1994Overall Score48.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
49.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
NissanMakeFord
CedricModelMaverick
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
17,6 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
163 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2825 ccEngine displacement2663 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
178 NmTorque221 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/80 R15 R
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
4780 mmLength4105 mm
1745 mmWidth1735 mm
1410 mmHeight1805 mm
1590 KgWeight1730 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Nissan Cedric and 1994 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…