2005 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0i (150 Hp) 2005Overall Score68.5/100
2005 Nissan Bluebird vs 2005 BMW X3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.0i (150 Hp) 2005Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationBMW X3
NissanMakeBMW
BluebirdModelX3
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationBMW X3
9,2 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
201 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
200 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationBMW X3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank67 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
1 CVTGears5
185/65 R15Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationBMW X3
4470 mmLength4569 mm
1695 mmWidth1853 mm
1445 mmHeight1674 mm
1220 KgWeight1660 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2795 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Nissan Bluebird and 2005 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…