2005 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.0 CD (143 Hp) 2005Overall Score67.75/100
2005 Mazda 6 vs 2005 Nissan Bluebird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0i (150 Hp) 2005Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan Bluebird
MazdaMakeNissan
6ModelBluebird
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan Bluebird
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
201 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
360 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan Bluebird
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan Bluebird
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears1 CVT
205/55 R16 HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan Bluebird
4710 mmLength4470 mm
1780 mmWidth1695 mm
1480 mmHeight1445 mm
1520 KgWeight1220 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2535 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Mazda 6 and 2005 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…