2005 • BMW
X3
BMW X3 2.0i (150 Hp) 2005Overall Score68.25/100
2005 BMW X3 vs 2005 Nissan Bluebird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0i (150 Hp) 2005Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X3SpecificationNissan Bluebird
BMWMakeNissan
X3ModelBluebird
2005Model year2005
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
BMW X3SpecificationNissan Bluebird
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
198 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
200 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X3SpecificationNissan Bluebird
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X3SpecificationNissan Bluebird
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears1 CVT
235/55 R17Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X3SpecificationNissan Bluebird
4569 mmLength4470 mm
1853 mmWidth1695 mm
1674 mmHeight1445 mm
1660 KgWeight1220 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2535 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 BMW X3 and 2005 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…