DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Bluebird vs 2012 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
BluebirdModelV50
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
133 HPPower145 HP
191 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
1 CVTGears5
195/60 R16Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4522 mm
1695 mmWidth1845 mm
1510 mmHeight1457 mm
1230 KgWeight1381 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Bluebird and 2012 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…