2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0F (145 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Nissan Bluebird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0i (133 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan Bluebird
VolvoMakeNissan
S40ModelBluebird
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan Bluebird
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
145 HPPower133 HP
185 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan Bluebird
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan Bluebird
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears1 CVT
—Tyre size195/60 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan Bluebird
4476 mmLength4610 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1454 mmHeight1510 mm
1360 KgWeight1230 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…