2012 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 1.6 Drive (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
2012 Volvo S60 vs 2012 Nissan Bluebird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0i (133 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan Bluebird
VolvoMakeNissan
S60ModelBluebird
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan Bluebird
10,9 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
115 HPPower133 HP
270 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan Bluebird
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan Bluebird
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears1 CVT
—Tyre size195/60 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan Bluebird
4628 mmLength4610 mm
1865 mmWidth1695 mm
1484 mmHeight1510 mm
1488 KgWeight1230 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S60 and 2012 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…