2000 • Nissan
Altima
Nissan Altima 2.4 16V (152 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Nissan Altima vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.3 i SE (150 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Altima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan AltimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
NissanMakeSaab
AltimaModel9-3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Nissan AltimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
8,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
180 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
152 HPPower150 HP
209 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan AltimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption14,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan AltimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 VR16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan AltimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
4660 mmLength4629 mm
1760 mmWidth1711 mm
1420 mmHeight1440 mm
1325 KgWeight1600 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Altima and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…