DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Frontier vs 2000 Nissan Altima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Altima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
FrontierModelAltima
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
143 HPPower152 HP
209 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/75 R14; 215/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4981 mmLength4660 mm
1689 mmWidth1760 mm
1590 mmHeight1420 mm
—Weight1325 Kg
2649 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Frontier and 2000 Nissan Altima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…