2000 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.3 i SE (150 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Nissan Altima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Altima
Nissan Altima 2.4 16V (152 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Altima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Altima
SaabMakeNissan
9-3ModelAltima
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Altima
11,0 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
205 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
150 HPPower152 HP
210 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Altima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Altima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 VR16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Altima
4629 mmLength4660 mm
1711 mmWidth1760 mm
1440 mmHeight1420 mm
1600 KgWeight1325 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Nissan Altima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…