DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan AD vs 2016 Renault Captur Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Captur

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeRenault
ADModelCaptur
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,03 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
148 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption4,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,6 lt
—Average consumption3,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16; 205/55 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4122 mm
1695 mmWidth1778 mm
1500 mmHeight1566 mm
—Weight1190 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan AD and 2016 Renault Captur approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Captur leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…