E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
MazdaMakeNissan
3ModelAD
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower109 HP
270 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank41 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationNissan AD
4460 mmLength4395 mm
1795 mmWidth1695 mm
1450 mmHeight1500 mm
1270 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS2016 Mazda 3Ford KA vs Mazda 32016 and 2016 model years2016 Toyota AvanzaVS2016 Mazda 3Toyota Avanza vs Mazda 32016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 Mazda 3Scion iA vs Mazda 32016 and 2016 model years2016 Toyota ViosVS2016 Mazda 3Toyota Vios vs Mazda 32016 and 2016 model years2016 Toyota YarisVS2016 Mazda 3Toyota Yaris vs Mazda 32016 and 2016 model years

Comments are loading…