DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 2 vs 2016 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
MazdaMakeNissan
2ModelAD
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
178 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower109 HP
220 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank41 lt
3,8 ltUrban consumption—
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationNissan AD
4060 mmLength4395 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1495 mmHeight1500 mm
1040 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 2 and 2016 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…