DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda CRX vs 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CRX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeAlfa Romeo
CRXModel146
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
182 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1712 cc
125 HPPower129 HP
144 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size185/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4005 mmLength4257 mm
1695 mmWidth1712 mm
1255 mmHeight1425 mm
1000 KgWeight1225 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda CRX and 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CRX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…